Notes
Confidential computing and AI trust boundaries
How confidential execution and attestation fit into a broader AI assurance design.
Background & research notes · AGIACC
Technical note · 26 October 2026. Confidential computing is a technology option under evaluation; this page does not announce an AGIACC deployment.
Name the infrastructure threat#
An AI workload may need to protect model weights, inputs, or credentials from infrastructure outside its trust boundary. A Trusted Execution Environment can provide isolation and protect data in use under a platform-specific threat model. The supported hardware, firmware, guest software, and operational controls all matter. NVIDIA’s documentation distinguishes deployment boundaries and supported configurations.
Attestation informs a decision#
Remote attestation provides evidence about an execution environment. A verifier still needs a policy: which measurements, versions, configurations, and freshness requirements are acceptable before releasing a secret? Deployment and update procedures must also address revoked evidence and failed verification.
A measured environment may still contain application vulnerabilities or an unsafe policy. Protection from a host administrator does not automatically isolate every plugin inside a guest or make model-generated actions safe.
Evaluate the composed system#
For a future reference platform, useful measurements include startup and attestation time, inference latency, throughput, memory use, and failure behavior. The comparison needs a stated baseline and configuration. We will choose mechanisms around the workload and threat model; security, safety, and operational cost must be evaluated together.
The next research question is how confidential execution composes with runtime boundaries, memory protection, and application-level authorization.